SHRM is recommending to its membership that we contact our Congressional representatives, both houses, and tell them to VOTE NO. I will add to that “HELL NO”. The misnamed piece of legislation is a nightmare. Here are the provisions of it. Specifically, the bill would:
- facilitate class action lawsuits by repealing the requirement that employees must give their written consent to become a party in a gender discrimination class action,
- lift the caps on compensatory or punitive damages for which employers would be liable, in addition to current liability for back pay. Such damages would apply to even unintentional pay disparities,
- prevent employers from retaliating against employees who disclose or discuss the wages of other employees,
- prohibit certain employer defenses for pay disparities. For example, the bill would eliminate an employer’s ability to justify paying different salaries to workers based in different locations with different costs of living.
That last bullet point alone is enough to show how nuts this is! It means if you have locations in high paying cities and lower paying cities (because of the cost of living) you will have to pay everyone the HIGHER WAGE.
I am not for wage discrimination in any form, but falling back to the past rejected concept of comparable worth is not the way to go. Comparable worth pay systems require the government, rather than the private market, to determine employees’ wages. Congress explicitly rejected comparable worth during the original Equal Pay Act debate—when wage disparities between women and men were greater—because it would mandate the same pay for completely different jobs. Furthermore, courts have repeatedly declared that the Equal Pay Act does not require a comparable worth system.
Watch this one and shake in your HR boots as we move to a Democrat lead administration and Congress.
Sign up for free HR Solutions updates via email